If the transport is not up to this task it should be either repaired or put up for recycling. These signals will vary very slightly every single time but within the specified limits. And the same goes for the main task of a transport which is, whether it is an el cheapo or a laughably expensive 'audiophile' model, to again and again retrieve the same data from a good quality audio cd and send this data to a DAC in the form of electrical signals. Every electronic part in your transport is engineered to function within certain specification limits. Which means that if I upgrade, I will be looking at CD transports rather than CD players.Īppreciate the discourse and opinions, thanks all!Ĭlick to expand.Folks, this is key. What I think I have heard is that the CD transport does in fact matter, and in significant, audible ways. I expected to hear (and not based on much fact from my end - more of an opinion that I wanted feedback on) that there would be no difference that, given a digital output from CDP/CDT to the amp, the only difference would be in the quality of the DAC decoding the digital signal. Given my intention to use one of the two DACs I already have, my question is simply: Would I notice an audible difference by going with a CD transport vs. Either option would use an optical out cable into either an iFi Zen DAC or the DAC in my Yamaha A-S701. To put my question into context, I am considering upgrading my barely-mid range but still very reliable CD player (Sony DVP-NS775V CD/DVD/SACD Player) with something better - most likely either a Yamaha CD player (reliable, cost-effective, and can be controlled with my Yamaha amp remote) or a Cambridge Audio CXC (CD transport). From a cost/performance perspective, Schiit's transport offering very well may be worth looking into. Schiit Audio most likely will be offering a transport later this year. My advice to the OP would be either buy a well-built and designed CDP or just go separates (dedicated transport and DAC). The one occasion where I did use one as a transport was with an Audio Note CD 2.1x to an Audio Note DAC 2.1x Signature as a cost saving measure. Personally, and although I have done so in the past I would not use a CDP as a transport. It depends on the quality of the transport. The CD transport can improve or degrade the sound. The cable is part of the overall signal delivery from the transport to DAC and its resulting signal. Level of jitter, the quality of the laser lens, inner cabling, master clock quality, the associated circuitry, transformer and power supply, etc. The CD transport itself doesn’t have a sound signature however, there are other design considerations that determining how good the CD transport is: Honestly, I don't really care at this point. The OP could have removed all confusion by asking: "Do all CD transports. Click to expand.The problem I'm having is the wording: "Do all CD players.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |